Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1193

reference
672-tree-1
name
1193
tree-preservation-order

undefined

672-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.017741 50.880707)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.017684 50.880701,-1.017686 50.880712,-1.017694 50.880722,-1.017707 50.880730,-1.017722 50.880735,-1.017740 50.880737,-1.017758 50.880736,-1.017774 50.880731,-1.017786 50.880723,-1.017795 50.880713,-1.017798 50.880702,-1.017795 50.880691,-1.017787 50.880681,-1.017775 50.880673,-1.017759 50.880667,-1.017742 50.880665,-1.017724 50.880667,-1.017708 50.880672,-1.017695 50.880680,-1.017687 50.880690,-1.017684 50.880701)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL